MEPDF
Price
$15.90
Change
-$0.35 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.6B
SHPMY
Price
$8.00
Change
-$0.06 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEPDF vs SHPMY

Header iconMEPDF vs SHPMY Comparison
Open Charts MEPDF vs SHPMYBanner chart's image
Medipal Holdings
Price$15.90
Change-$0.35 (-2.15%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.6B
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Price$8.00
Change-$0.06 (-0.74%)
Volume$761
Capitalization8.8B
MEPDF vs SHPMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEPDF vs. SHPMY commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEPDF is a Hold and SHPMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MEPDF: $15.90 vs. SHPMY: $8.00)
Brand notoriety: MEPDF and SHPMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEPDF: 64% vs. SHPMY: 156%
Market capitalization -- MEPDF: $3.6B vs. SHPMY: $8.8B
MEPDF [@Medical Distributors] is valued at $3.6B. SHPMY’s [@Medical Distributors] market capitalization is $8.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Distributors] industry ranges from $83.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Distributors] industry is $10.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEPDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHPMY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MEPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHPMY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEPDF is a better buy in the long-term than SHPMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEPDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHPMY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MEPDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SHPMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHPMY is a better buy in the short-term than MEPDF.

Price Growth

MEPDF (@Medical Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHPMY (@Medical Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Distributors (+1.84% weekly)

Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHPMY($8.8B) has a higher market cap than MEPDF($3.6B). MEPDF has higher P/E ratio than SHPMY: MEPDF (12.11) vs SHPMY (9.81). MEPDF YTD gains are higher at: 20.091 vs. SHPMY (-1.350).
MEPDFSHPMYMEPDF / SHPMY
Capitalization3.6B8.8B41%
EBITDA100BN/A-
Gain YTD20.091-1.350-1,488%
P/E Ratio12.119.81123%
Revenue3.6TN/A-
Total Cash251BN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEPDF vs SHPMY: Fundamental Ratings
MEPDF
SHPMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5084
SMR RATING
1..100
5281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3356
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHPMY's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as MEPDF (87). This means that SHPMY’s stock grew similarly to MEPDF’s over the last 12 months.

MEPDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHPMY (84). This means that MEPDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHPMY’s over the last 12 months.

MEPDF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SHPMY (81). This means that MEPDF’s stock grew similarly to SHPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SHPMY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MEPDF (55). This means that SHPMY’s stock grew similarly to MEPDF’s over the last 12 months.

MEPDF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as SHPMY (56). This means that MEPDF’s stock grew similarly to SHPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEPDFSHPMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVDS11.770.16
+1.38%
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
XXCH28.14N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkt Ex Chn Bl 2X
STRV41.62-0.13
-0.31%
Strive 500 ETF
KBWY15.54-0.05
-0.32%
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Eq REIT ETF
OWNB30.29-0.71
-2.29%
Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF

MEPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEPDF and COSM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEPDF and COSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEPDF
1D Price
Change %
MEPDF100%
N/A
COSM - MEPDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
MAHLY - MEPDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHPMF - MEPDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDRX - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARRJF - MEPDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHPMY and PDRX have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHPMY and PDRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHPMY
1D Price
Change %
SHPMY100%
N/A
PDRX - SHPMY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZYXI - SHPMY
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.40%
NSVGF - SHPMY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHTDF - SHPMY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
MEPDF - SHPMY
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More