MEEEF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
4.13M
WRSLF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
204.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEEEF vs WRSLF

Header iconMEEEF vs WRSLF Comparison
Open Charts MEEEF vs WRSLFBanner chart's image
Metal Energy
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.13M
Winsome Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization204.1M
MEEEF vs WRSLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEEEF vs. WRSLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEEEF is a Hold and WRSLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MEEEF: $0.02 vs. WRSLF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: MEEEF and WRSLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEEEF: 25% vs. WRSLF: 9%
Market capitalization -- MEEEF: $4.13M vs. WRSLF: $204.1M
MEEEF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.13M. WRSLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $204.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEEEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEEEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WRSLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEEEF is a better buy in the long-term than WRSLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEEEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRSLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MEEEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WRSLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WRSLF is a better buy in the short-term than MEEEF.

Price Growth

MEEEF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WRSLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRSLF($204M) has a higher market cap than MEEEF($4.13M). MEEEF YTD gains are higher at: -40.845 vs. WRSLF (-64.353). MEEEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.41M vs. WRSLF (-10.63M). WRSLF has more cash in the bank: 13.5M vs. MEEEF (1.8M).
MEEEFWRSLFMEEEF / WRSLF
Capitalization4.13M204M2%
EBITDA-4.41M-10.63M41%
Gain YTD-40.845-64.35363%
P/E Ratio0.20N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.8M13.5M13%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEEEFWRSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRSLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNDO1.420.05
+3.65%
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
FDBC48.591.24
+2.62%
Fidelity D & D Bancorp
CWST113.401.81
+1.62%
Casella Waste Systems
TJX125.860.55
+0.44%
TJX Companies
NX20.51-0.48
-2.29%
Quanex Building Products Corp

MEEEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEEEF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEEEF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEEEF
1D Price
Change %
MEEEF100%
N/A
TMQ - MEEEF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTMLF - MEEEF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMVVF - MEEEF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUEXF - MEEEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
WRSLF - MEEEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRSLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRSLF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRSLF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRSLF
1D Price
Change %
WRSLF100%
N/A
IVPAF - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
ERMAY - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSDY - WRSLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CRECF - WRSLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
PILBF - WRSLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
More