MEEEF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.13M
STLNF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.74M
Ad is loading...

MEEEF vs STLNF

Header iconMEEEF vs STLNF Comparison
Open Charts MEEEF vs STLNFBanner chart's image
Metal Energy
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization4.13M
STALLION URANIUM
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$36.1K
Capitalization10.74M
MEEEF vs STLNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEEEF vs. STLNF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEEEF is a Hold and STLNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (MEEEF: $0.02 vs. STLNF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: MEEEF and STLNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEEEF: 248% vs. STLNF: 22%
Market capitalization -- MEEEF: $4.13M vs. STLNF: $10.74M
MEEEF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.13M. STLNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEEEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEEEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STLNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MEEEF and STLNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

MEEEF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STLNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STLNF($10.7M) has a higher market cap than MEEEF($4.13M). STLNF YTD gains are higher at: 30.952 vs. MEEEF (-21.831). STLNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. MEEEF (-4.41M). STLNF has more cash in the bank: 3.43M vs. MEEEF (1.8M). MEEEF (0) and STLNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MEEEFSTLNFMEEEF / STLNF
Capitalization4.13M10.7M39%
EBITDA-4.41M-1.14M388%
Gain YTD-21.83130.952-71%
P/E Ratio0.20N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.8M3.43M53%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

MEEEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MEEEF and TMQ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEEEF and TMQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEEEF
1D Price
Change %
MEEEF100%
N/A
TMQ - MEEEF
25%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
GTMLF - MEEEF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMVVF - MEEEF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STLNF - MEEEF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
QUEXF - MEEEF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
More

STLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STLNF and AMYZF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STLNF and AMYZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLNF
1D Price
Change %
STLNF100%
+9.18%
AMYZF - STLNF
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.78%
TWOSF - STLNF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
GOLXF - STLNF
26%
Poorly correlated
+8.50%
HANCF - STLNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSTRF - STLNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More