MED
Price
$12.70
Change
+$0.23 (+1.84%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
417.52M
63 days until earnings call
WGHTQ
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
146.53M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MED vs WGHTQ

Header iconMED vs WGHTQ Comparison
Open Charts MED vs WGHTQBanner chart's image
Medifast
Price$12.70
Change+$0.23 (+1.84%)
Volume$256.84K
Capitalization417.52M
WW International
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$610.56K
Capitalization146.53M
MED vs WGHTQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGHTQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MED vs. WGHTQ commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a Hold and WGHTQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MED: $13.48 vs. WGHTQ: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: MED: Not notable vs. WGHTQ: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MED: 50% vs. WGHTQ: 2%
Market capitalization -- MED: $417.52M vs. WGHTQ: $146.53M
MED [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $417.52M. WGHTQ’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $146.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWGHTQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WGHTQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the long-term than WGHTQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MED’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGHTQ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MED’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WGHTQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the short-term than WGHTQ.

Price Growth

MED (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +1.81% price change this week, while WGHTQ (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

MED is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

WGHTQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+2.04% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MED($418M) has a higher market cap than WGHTQ($147M). WGHTQ has higher P/E ratio than MED: WGHTQ (4.87) vs MED (4.12). MED YTD gains are higher at: -23.496 vs. WGHTQ (-79.134). MED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. WGHTQ (74.7M). MED has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. WGHTQ (109M). MED has less debt than WGHTQ: MED (22M) vs WGHTQ (1.49B). MED has higher revenues than WGHTQ: MED (1.07B) vs WGHTQ (890M).
MEDWGHTQMED / WGHTQ
Capitalization418M147M284%
EBITDA140M74.7M187%
Gain YTD-23.496-79.13430%
P/E Ratio4.124.8785%
Revenue1.07B890M120%
Total Cash150M109M138%
Total Debt22M1.49B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MED vs WGHTQ: Fundamental Ratings
MED
WGHTQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
791
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6197
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WGHTQ (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than WGHTQ’s over the last 12 months.

MED's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WGHTQ (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to WGHTQ’s over the last 12 months.

MED's SMR Rating (89) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as WGHTQ (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to WGHTQ’s over the last 12 months.

MED's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WGHTQ (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew somewhat faster than WGHTQ’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for WGHTQ (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew significantly faster than WGHTQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEDWGHTQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WGHTQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

MED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MED and TNL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MED and TNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MED
1D Price
Change %
MED100%
-2.74%
TNL - MED
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
MCW - MED
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
WGHTQ - MED
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
FTDR - MED
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
LIND - MED
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
More

WGHTQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGHTQ has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WGHTQ jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WGHTQ
1D Price
Change %
WGHTQ100%
-6.06%
MCW - WGHTQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
TNL - WGHTQ
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
SABR - WGHTQ
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
CSV - WGHTQ
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MED - WGHTQ
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
More