Advertisement
MED vs SCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MED is a Buy and SCI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MED’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MED’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SCI’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
MED (@Personnel Services) experienced а -6.45% price change this week, while SCI (@Personnel Services) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
MED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
SCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-2.02% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
| MED | SCI | MED / SCI | |
| Capitalization | 150M | 11.3B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 14.2M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -22.645 | 2.496 | -907% |
| P/E Ratio | 41.36 | 21.96 | 188% |
| Revenue | 480M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 163M | 142M | 115% |
| Total Debt | 13.1M | 5.04B | 0% |
MED | SCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MED's Valuation (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as SCI (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew significantly faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's SMR Rating (28) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (91) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.
MED's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCI (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCI’s over the last 12 months.
| MED | SCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 18 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MVLL | 23.62 | 2.07 | +9.61% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | |||
| FDWM | 25.24 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF | |||
| RQI | 12.28 | -0.09 | -0.73% |
| COHEN & STEERS QUALITY Income REALTY FUND | |||
| NUEM | 35.22 | -0.26 | -0.75% |
| Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF | |||
| MAGX | 55.01 | -1.00 | -1.79% |
| Roundhill Daily 2X Lon Mag Sev ETF | |||
MED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MED and FTDR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MED and FTDR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MED | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| FTDR - MED | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| TNL - MED | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| MCW - MED | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| SCI - MED | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| LIND - MED | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
SCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCI has been loosely correlated with CSV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCI jumps, then CSV could also see price increases.