MEC vs TUSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEC is a Hold and TUSK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MEC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MEC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MEC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TUSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MEC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TUSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MEC (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +0.23% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -5.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
MEC is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (-5.22% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| MEC | TUSK | MEC / TUSK | |
| Capitalization | 355M | 177M | 201% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 67M | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.845 | -21.300 | -103% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.19 | 23.38 | 125% |
| Revenue | N/A | 309M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 16.6M | - |
| Total Debt | 181M | 63.3M | 286% |
TUSK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MEC | TUSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 0% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 0% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
MEC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MEC and GFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MEC and GFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MEC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEC | 100% | +1.80% | ||
| GFF - MEC | 33% Poorly correlated | +18.20% | ||
| NWPX - MEC | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| VMI - MEC | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| TRC - MEC | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
| CODI - MEC | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
TUSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TUSK has been loosely correlated with CODI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TUSK jumps, then CODI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TUSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| CODI - TUSK | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MLI - TUSK | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| TRC - TUSK | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| IIIN - TUSK | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.00% | ||
| MEC - TUSK | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
More | ||||