Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs QMOM
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs QMOM
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$88.70
Change+$0.57 (+0.65%)
Volume$60.95K
Net Assets2.31B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$64.15
Change+$0.56 (+0.88%)
Volume$90.47K
Net Assets351.06M
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. QMOM commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Buy and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.31B vs. QMOM (351M). MDYG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: MDYG (2.500) vs QMOM (0.031). MDYG was incepted earlier than QMOM: MDYG (20 years) vs QMOM (10 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover MDYG (51.00) vs MDYG (51.00).
| MDYG | QMOM | MDYG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.500 | 0.031 | 8,015% |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 351M | 659% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.29 | 52% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 363.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 1.39 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 81% | 28 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| JEF - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| EQH - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| VNT - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| MS - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| EME - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| STEP - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| CW - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.90% | ||
More | ||||