Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs QMOM
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs QMOM
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$83.95
Change-$1.44 (-1.69%)
Volume$47.35K
Net Assets2.23B
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$62.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.14%)
Volume$8.01K
Net Assets316.77M
MDYG vs QMOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. QMOM commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Hold and QMOM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.23B vs. QMOM (317M). QMOM has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: QMOM (-2.479) vs MDYG (-3.206). MDYG was incepted earlier than QMOM: MDYG (20 years) vs QMOM (10 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover MDYG (51.00) vs MDYG (51.00).
| MDYG | QMOM | MDYG / QMOM | |
| Gain YTD | -3.206 | -2.479 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 317M | 704% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.29 | 52% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 363.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 1.46 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 83% | 19 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| EQH - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| JEF - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| VNT - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| MS - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| EME - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| STEP - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| CW - QMOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| JEF - QMOM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
More | ||||