| MDYG | QMID | MDYG / QMID | |
| Gain YTD | 7.008 | 6.546 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 1.44M | 169,167% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.38 | 39% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 50.00 | 82% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 2 years | - |
| MDYG | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 78% | 18 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIVB | 53.37 | 0.74 | +1.41% |
| iShares Core Dividend ETF | |||
| ISCB | 65.34 | 0.84 | +1.30% |
| iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | |||
| NVBU | 29.12 | 0.20 | +0.69% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncNovETF | |||
| FTWO | 39.83 | 0.26 | +0.67% |
| Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF | |||
| TVE | 24.28 | 0.09 | +0.37% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +2.73% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| CSW - QMID | 41% Loosely correlated | +9.01% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| CR - QMID | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| DBX - QMID | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| LECO - QMID | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.48% | ||
More | ||||