Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs QMID
MDYG vs QMID Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs QMID
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$94.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.76K
Net Assets2.5B
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
Price$29.09
Change+$0.19 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45M
MDYG vs QMID Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. QMID commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Hold and QMID is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.5B vs. QMID (1.45M). MDYG has a higher annual dividend yield than QMID: MDYG (9.543) vs QMID (6.902). MDYG was incepted earlier than QMID: MDYG (20 years) vs QMID (2 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than QMID (0.38). QMID has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| MDYG | QMID | MDYG / QMID | |
| Gain YTD | 9.543 | 6.902 | 138% |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 1.45M | 172,077% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.38 | 39% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 50.00 | 82% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 23 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 3 days ago 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | N/A | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
QMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with CSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then CSW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | N/A | ||
| CSW - QMID | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CHDN - QMID | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CR - QMID | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| DBX - QMID | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||