Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs PFUT
MDYG vs PFUT Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs PFUT
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$90.25
Change-$2.16 (-2.34%)
Volume$78.98K
Net Assets2.37B
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Price$25.23
Change-$0.50 (-1.94%)
Volume$8.09K
Net Assets382.39M
MDYG vs PFUT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. PFUT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Buy and PFUT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.37B vs. PFUT (382M). MDYG has a higher annual dividend yield than PFUT: MDYG (6.973) vs PFUT (3.926). MDYG was incepted earlier than PFUT: MDYG (20 years) vs PFUT (4 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than PFUT (0.65). PFUT has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| MDYG | PFUT | MDYG / PFUT | |
| Gain YTD | 6.973 | 3.926 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 382M | 620% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.65 | 23% |
| Turnover | 41.00 | 71.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 0.78 | 0.03 | 2,655% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||
PFUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFUT has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFUT jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFUT | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| TPG - PFUT | 76% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| GEV - PFUT | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CAVA - PFUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| GTLB - PFUT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| TOST - PFUT | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||