Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs NBSM
MDYG vs NBSM Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs NBSM
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$90.28
Change+$1.09 (+1.22%)
Volume$66.87K
Net Assets2.38B
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
Price$25.84
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
Volume$24.25K
Net Assets176.4M
MDYG vs NBSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. NBSM commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Buy and NBSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.38B vs. NBSM (176M). MDYG has a higher annual dividend yield than NBSM: MDYG (4.326) vs NBSM (1.938). MDYG was incepted earlier than NBSM: MDYG (20 years) vs NBSM (1 year). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NBSM (0.65). MDYG has a higher turnover NBSM (12.00) vs NBSM (12.00).
| MDYG | NBSM | MDYG / NBSM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.326 | 1.938 | 223% |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 176M | 1,354% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.65 | 23% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 12.00 | 425% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 0.23 | 367% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | NBSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| JEF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| EQH - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| VNT - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
NBSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBSM has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBSM jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBSM | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| ITT - NBSM | 86% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AWI - NBSM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| LECO - NBSM | 78% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| LFUS - NBSM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| GTES - NBSM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
More | ||||