Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDYG vs NBSM
MDYG vs NBSM Comparison
Open Charts MDYG vs NBSM
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$83.95
Change-$1.44 (-1.69%)
Volume$47.35K
Net Assets2.2B
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
Price$24.46
Change-$0.39 (-1.57%)
Volume$16.18K
Net Assets172.2M
MDYG vs NBSM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDYG vs. NBSM commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDYG is a Hold and NBSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.2B vs. NBSM (172M). MDYG has a higher annual dividend yield than NBSM: MDYG (-3.206) vs NBSM (-3.511). MDYG was incepted earlier than NBSM: MDYG (20 years) vs NBSM (1 year). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than NBSM (0.65). MDYG has a higher turnover NBSM (12.00) vs NBSM (12.00).
| MDYG | NBSM | MDYG / NBSM | |
| Gain YTD | -3.206 | -3.511 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 172M | 1,277% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.65 | 23% |
| Turnover | 51.00 | 12.00 | 425% |
| Yield | 0.91 | 0.24 | 377% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDYG | NBSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 83% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| EQH - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| JEF - MDYG | 82% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| VNT - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 81% Closely correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||
NBSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBSM has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBSM jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBSM | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| ITT - NBSM | 87% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| AWI - NBSM | 83% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| LECO - NBSM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| LFUS - NBSM | 78% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| SSD - NBSM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||