Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDY vs ONEO
MDY vs ONEO Comparison
Open Charts MDY vs ONEO
SPDR® S&P MIDCAP 400 ETF Trust
Price$590.73
Change-$3.30 (-0.56%)
Volume$12.06K
Net Assets23.85B
SPDR® Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
Price$127.31
Change-$1.36 (-1.06%)
Volume$117
Net Assets96.27M
MDY vs ONEO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDY vs. ONEO commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDY is a Hold and ONEO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDY has more net assets: 23.8B vs. ONEO (96.3M). ONEO has a higher annual dividend yield than MDY: ONEO (8.295) vs MDY (5.167). MDY was incepted earlier than ONEO: MDY (30 years) vs ONEO (10 years). ONEO (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than MDY (0.24). ONEO has a higher turnover MDY (20.43) vs MDY (20.43).
| MDY | ONEO | MDY / ONEO | |
| Gain YTD | 5.167 | 8.295 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 96.3M | 24,714% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.24 | 0.20 | 120% |
| Turnover | 20.43 | 50.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 1.15 | 1.32 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MDY | ONEO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDY has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDY jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDY | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| AVNT - MDY | 79% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| FHN - MDY | 75% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| GGG - MDY | 73% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| CG - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
| IBOC - MDY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||
ONEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONEO has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONEO jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONEO | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| BLDR - ONEO | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| RS - ONEO | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| LRCX - ONEO | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| WSM - ONEO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CTSH - ONEO | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||