Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RWMHX
MDVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RWMHX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$9.24
Change+$0.41 (+4.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.09M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
MDVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. MDVZX (154M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: MDVZX (1.78) vs RWMHX (1.36). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). MDVZX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RWMHX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). MDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. RWMHX (5.40). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. MDVZX (22.31).
| MDVZX | RWMHX | MDVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.41 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.41 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.442 | 1.523 | 489% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.36 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.56 | 5.40 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.03 | 30.10 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.31 | 37.20 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers