Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RWEBX
MDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RWEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.85M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.45
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
MDVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. MDVZX (149M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: MDVZX (1.94) vs RWEBX (0.74). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RWEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). MDVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. RWEBX (5.80). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. MDVZX (18.58).
| MDVZX | RWEBX | MDVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.06 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.06 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.423 | 7.648 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.74 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 5.80 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.65 | 30.20 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.58 | 38.17 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers