Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.66
Change+$0.05 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.52M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. MDVZX (149M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.19) vs RMFCX (1.27). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.38 vs. MDVZX (1.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.49 vs. MDVZX (33.72).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.514 | 11.347 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.27 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | 11.38 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.03 | 30.87 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.72 | 60.49 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers