Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.24
Change-$0.05 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.17M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. MDVZX (145M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (2.28) vs RMFCX (1.31). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. MDVZX (1.23). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. MDVZX (31.86).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 6.021 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145M | 107B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 1.31 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.23 | 8.70 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.94 | 28.43 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.86 | 59.85 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement