Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMFCX
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.85M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
MDVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. MDVZX (149M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDVZX (1.94) vs RMFCX (1.18). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMFCX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMFCX (8.05) and MDVZX (7.89) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. MDVZX (18.58).
| MDVZX | RMFCX | MDVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.91 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.423 | 9.696 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.18 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 8.05 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.65 | 28.89 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.58 | 46.17 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers