Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMEBX
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.38M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. MDVZX (146M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDVZX (2.00) vs RMEBX (1.05). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. MDVZX (-2.46). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. MDVZX (29.13).
| MDVZX | RMEBX | MDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.172 | 13.527 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.05 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.46 | 4.81 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.28 | 38.19 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 55.95 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement