Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMEBX
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.96
Change-$0.06 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.32M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. MDVZX (147M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDVZX (2.00) vs RMEBX (1.05). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDVZX (7 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. MDVZX (-0.64). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. MDVZX (27.75).
| MDVZX | RMEBX | MDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.541 | 14.940 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.05 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.64 | 6.55 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 30.03 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.75 | 53.80 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers