Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDVZX vs RMEBX
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDVZX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Z
Price$8.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.71M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
MDVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDVZX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. MDVZX (150M). MDVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDVZX (2.19) vs RMEBX (1.12). MDVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDVZX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDVZX (0.45). MDVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDVZX: RMEBX (250) vs MDVZX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. MDVZX (4.25). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. MDVZX (36.14).
| MDVZX | RMEBX | MDVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.07 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.149 | 9.495 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 1.12 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 11.31 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 28.70 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.14 | 60.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.57 | - |