MDIKF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
5.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WYGPF
Price
$8.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MDIKF vs WYGPF

Header iconMDIKF vs WYGPF Comparison
Open Charts MDIKF vs WYGPFBanner chart's image
Modec
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.79B
Worley
Price$8.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.15K
Capitalization4.79B
MDIKF vs WYGPF Comparison Chart in %
MDIKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WYGPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MDIKF vs. WYGPF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDIKF is a Buy and WYGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MDIKF: $67.00 vs. WYGPF: $8.39)
Brand notoriety: MDIKF and WYGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MDIKF: 100% vs. WYGPF: 62%
Market capitalization -- MDIKF: $5.91B vs. WYGPF: $4.73B
MDIKF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $5.91B. WYGPF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MDIKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWYGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MDIKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WYGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDIKF is a better buy in the long-term than WYGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDIKF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WYGPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MDIKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WYGPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDIKF is a better buy in the short-term than WYGPF.

Price Growth

MDIKF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WYGPF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.33% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIKF($5.79B) has a higher market cap than WYGPF($4.79B). MDIKF has higher P/E ratio than WYGPF: MDIKF (18.98) vs WYGPF (16.65). MDIKF YTD gains are higher at: 266.320 vs. WYGPF (-3.674). WYGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.02B vs. MDIKF (432M). MDIKF has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. WYGPF (962M). MDIKF has less debt than WYGPF: MDIKF (420M) vs WYGPF (2.45B). WYGPF has higher revenues than MDIKF: WYGPF (11.2B) vs MDIKF (4.38B).
MDIKFWYGPFMDIKF / WYGPF
Capitalization5.79B4.79B121%
EBITDA432M1.02B42%
Gain YTD266.320-3.674-7,249%
P/E Ratio18.9816.65114%
Revenue4.38B11.2B39%
Total Cash1.56B962M162%
Total Debt420M2.45B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDIKF vs WYGPF: Fundamental Ratings
MDIKF
WYGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4495
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
781
SMR RATING
1..100
4292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WYGPF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIKF (64). This means that WYGPF’s stock grew similarly to MDIKF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WYGPF (81). This means that MDIKF’s stock grew significantly faster than WYGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIKF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WYGPF (92). This means that MDIKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WYGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIKF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WYGPF (61). This means that MDIKF’s stock grew similarly to WYGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIKF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WYGPF (81). This means that MDIKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WYGPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDIKFWYGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MDIKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WYGPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRWTX26.440.24
+0.92%
Transamerica International Equity I3
VIVAX73.910.39
+0.53%
Vanguard Value Index Inv
RSEFX15.370.05
+0.33%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Svc
MRLSX20.190.03
+0.15%
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth I
NEFJX21.36-0.01
-0.05%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Small Cap A

MDIKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDIKF and TNRSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDIKF and TNRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIKF
1D Price
Change %
MDIKF100%
N/A
TNRSF - MDIKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRRVF - MDIKF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
TOTZF - MDIKF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
TAGP - MDIKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOLWF - MDIKF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More

WYGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WYGPF and TNRSF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WYGPF and TNRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WYGPF
1D Price
Change %
WYGPF100%
N/A
TNRSF - WYGPF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGSGY - WYGPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.78%
TRRVF - WYGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
MDIKF - WYGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TAGP - WYGPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More