Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFEX
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFEX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.8M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. MDFSX (146M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: MDFSX (1.88) vs RMFEX (1.46). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). MDFSX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFEX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. MDFSX (-3.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. MDFSX (25.26).
| MDFSX | RMFEX | MDFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.999 | 13.941 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.46 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.16 | 5.28 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.85 | 40.09 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.26 | 59.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.60 | 98.84 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement