Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFEX
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFEX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.33M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. MDFSX (144M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: MDFSX (2.14) vs RMFEX (1.58). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). MDFSX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFEX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. MDFSX (0.44). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.32 vs. MDFSX (27.71).
| MDFSX | RMFEX | MDFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.652 | 6.152 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.58 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | 9.03 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | 29.63 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.71 | 62.32 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.30 | 76.27 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement