Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFEX
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFEX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.50
Change+$0.33 (+4.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.6M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.55
Change-$1.72 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. MDFSX (153M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: MDFSX (1.66) vs RMFEX (1.50). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). MDFSX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFEX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). MDFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. RMFEX (7.80). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. MDFSX (17.69).
| MDFSX | RMFEX | MDFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.459 | 2.280 | 327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.50 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 7.80 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.07 | 29.96 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.69 | 46.45 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.48 | 114.19 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement