Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFEX
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFEX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.41M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
MDFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. MDFSX (148M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: MDFSX (1.97) vs RMFEX (1.49). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). MDFSX (0.75) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFEX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. MDFSX (0.57). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. MDFSX (26.75).
| MDFSX | RMFEX | MDFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.62 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.498 | 11.638 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.49 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.57 | 8.06 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.59 | 33.39 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.75 | 58.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.12 | 98.59 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement