Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.29
Change-$0.06 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.29M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. MDFSX (148M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (1.89) vs RMFCX (1.21). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. MDFSX (-2.38). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. MDFSX (22.76).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.418 | 15.093 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.21 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.38 | 6.67 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.95 | 30.56 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.76 | 54.90 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.40 | 94.04 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement