Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMFCX
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMFCX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.52
Change+$0.12 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.48M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
MDFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. MDFSX (149M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: MDFSX (1.83) vs RMFCX (1.18). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMFCX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. MDFSX (-0.82). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. MDFSX (20.71).
| MDFSX | RMFCX | MDFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.509 | 15.500 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.18 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.82 | 6.27 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.92 | 27.68 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.71 | 52.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.02 | 90.44 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers