Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.15
Change+$0.07 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.41M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. MDFSX (148M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (1.97) vs RMEBX (1.09). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. MDFSX (0.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. MDFSX (26.75).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.498 | 11.308 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.09 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.57 | 7.57 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.59 | 31.59 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.75 | 55.29 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.12 | 89.40 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement