Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$7.92
Change+$0.03 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.71M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. MDFSX (150M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.07) vs RMEBX (1.12). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. MDFSX (3.36). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. MDFSX (31.75).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.956 | 9.495 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.12 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 11.31 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.82 | 28.70 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.75 | 60.65 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.31 | 77.57 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers