Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.02
Change+$0.04 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.52M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. MDFSX (149M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (2.07) vs RMEBX (1.12). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. MDFSX (0.93). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. MDFSX (29.34).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.294 | 11.253 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.12 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.93 | 11.26 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.41 | 30.31 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.34 | 59.35 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.45 | 80.17 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers