Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MDFSX vs RMEBX
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts MDFSX vs RMEBX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S
Price$8.50
Change+$0.33 (+4.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.6M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
MDFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MDFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MDFSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. MDFSX (153M). MDFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: MDFSX (1.66) vs RMEBX (1.08). MDFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: MDFSX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than MDFSX (0.75). MDFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFSX: RMEBX (250) vs MDFSX (2000). MDFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. RMEBX (7.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. MDFSX (17.69).
| MDFSX | RMEBX | MDFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.459 | 2.231 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.08 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 7.30 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.07 | 28.21 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.69 | 43.15 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.48 | 103.95 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement