It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MDB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MDB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MDB (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.87% price change this week, while S (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.19%.
MDB is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
S is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
MDB | S | MDB / S | |
Capitalization | 26.1B | 7.13B | 366% |
EBITDA | -122M | -292.71M | 42% |
Gain YTD | -35.160 | -12.828 | 274% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.68B | 621M | 271% |
Total Cash | 2.02B | 926M | 218% |
Total Debt | 1.18B | 22.9M | 5,170% |
MDB | S | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDB's Valuation (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as S (68) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as MDB (71) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
S's SMR Rating (95) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as MDB (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
S's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as MDB (62) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for MDB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than MDB’s over the last 12 months.
MDB | S | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago81% | 15 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 8 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been loosely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDB | 100% | -0.20% | ||
SNOW - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
DDOG - MDB | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
GTLB - MDB | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
S - MDB | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
NET - MDB | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with DDOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then DDOG could also see price increases.