Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYSX vs RNWBX
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYSX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl R6
Price$14.77
Change+$1.09 (+7.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets120.2M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MCYSX (120M). MCYSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCYSX (1.17) vs RNWBX (0.45). MCYSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than MCYSX (1.25). MCYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). MCYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: MCYSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). MCYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.42 vs. RNWBX (26.27). MCYSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.11 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| MCYSX | RNWBX | MCYSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.66 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.66 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.979 | 5.996 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 120M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.45 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.42 | 26.27 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | 38.81 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.11 | 7.03 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement