Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYSX vs RNWBX
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYSX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl R6
Price$13.09
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.94M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
MCYSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYSX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. MCYSX (108M). MCYSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCYSX (0.54) vs RNWBX (0.12). MCYSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYSX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than MCYSX (1.25). MCYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). MCYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: MCYSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). MCYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.35 vs. RNWBX (18.68). MCYSX return over 5 years is better than : 10.27 vs. RNWBX (7.66).
| MCYSX | RNWBX | MCYSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.67 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.211 | 20.612 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.12 | 459% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.35 | 18.68 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.60 | 40.84 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.27 | 7.66 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers