Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYCX vs RNWBX
MCYCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYCX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl C
Price$14.37
Change+$1.15 (+8.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.17M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MCYCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MCYCX (116M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than MCYCX: RNWBX (0.45) vs MCYCX (0.11). MCYCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYCX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). MCYCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). MCYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCYCX: RNWBX (250) vs MCYCX (2500). MCYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.46 vs. RNWBX (26.27). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.03 vs. MCYCX (4.41).
| MCYCX | RNWBX | MCYCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 1.66 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.66 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.916 | 5.996 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.45 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.46 | 26.27 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.71 | 38.81 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.41 | 7.03 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement