Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCYAX vs RNWBX
MCYAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MCYAX vs RNWBX
NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Cl A
Price$14.76
Change+$1.12 (+8.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.17M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MCYAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCYAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCYAX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MCYAX (116M). MCYAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: MCYAX (0.84) vs RNWBX (0.45). MCYAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MCYAX (8 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) and MCYAX (1.58) have similar cost to investors . MCYAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCYAX: RNWBX (250) vs MCYAX (15000). MCYAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.28 vs. RNWBX (25.14). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.67 vs. MCYAX (5.13).
| MCYAX | RNWBX | MCYAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.66 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.66 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.194 | 5.906 | 139% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.45 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.28 | 25.14 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.69 | 38.69 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.13 | 7.67 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement