MCW
Price
$5.57
Change
-$0.06 (-1.07%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.82B
63 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$183.68
Change
-$0.95 (-0.51%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.13B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCW vs PAG

Header iconMCW vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts MCW vs PAGBanner chart's image
Mister Car Wash
Price$5.57
Change-$0.06 (-1.07%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization1.82B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$183.68
Change-$0.95 (-0.51%)
Volume$154.75K
Capitalization12.13B
MCW vs PAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCW vs. PAG commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCW is a Buy and PAG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (MCW: $5.57 vs. PAG: $184.63)
Brand notoriety: MCW and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCW: 77% vs. PAG: 78%
Market capitalization -- MCW: $1.82B vs. PAG: $12.13B
MCW [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $1.82B. PAG’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $12.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than MCW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCW and PAG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCW (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCW is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.20% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($12.1B) has a higher market cap than MCW($1.82B). MCW has higher P/E ratio than PAG: MCW (21.42) vs PAG (12.78). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 23.875 vs. MCW (-23.594). PAG has more cash in the bank: 155M vs. MCW (26.4M). MCW has less debt than PAG: MCW (1.79B) vs PAG (8.41B).
MCWPAGMCW / PAG
Capitalization1.82B12.1B15%
EBITDA273MN/A-
Gain YTD-23.59423.875-99%
P/E Ratio21.4212.78168%
Revenue1.03BN/A-
Total Cash26.4M155M17%
Total Debt1.79B8.41B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAG: Fundamental Ratings
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCWPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFLO29.01-0.02
-0.07%
VictoryShares Small Cap Fr CA Flw ETF
PNI6.58-0.02
-0.30%
PIMCO NEW YORK Municipal Income FUND II
FSMD43.64-0.18
-0.41%
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
JHDV38.31-0.47
-1.22%
JHancock U.S. High Dividend ETF
TETH21.33-0.36
-1.66%
21Shares Ethereum ETF

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+0.12%
AN - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
GPI - PAG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
ABG - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
LAD - PAG
73%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
SAH - PAG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More