MCW
Price
$5.22
Change
-$0.04 (-0.76%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.71B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MED
Price
$11.46
Change
-$0.17 (-1.46%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
125.96M
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCW vs MED

Header iconMCW vs MED Comparison
Open Charts MCW vs MEDBanner chart's image
Mister Car Wash
Price$5.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.76%)
Volume$959.75K
Capitalization1.71B
Medifast
Price$11.46
Change-$0.17 (-1.46%)
Volume$110.45K
Capitalization125.96M
MCW vs MED Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCW vs. MED commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCW is a Hold and MED is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MCW: $5.26 vs. MED: $11.63)
Brand notoriety: MCW and MED are both not notable
MCW represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while MED is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCW: 103% vs. MED: 93%
Market capitalization -- MCW: $1.71B vs. MED: $125.96M
MCW [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $1.71B. MED’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $125.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $45.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.58B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the long-term than MCW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MED’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MED’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCW is a better buy in the short-term than MED.

Price Growth

MCW (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while MED (@Personnel Services) price change was -4.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +462.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

MED is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.45% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Personnel Services (-2.82% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCW($1.71B) has a higher market cap than MED($126M). MED has higher P/E ratio than MCW: MED (573.00) vs MCW (19.31). MCW YTD gains are higher at: -27.846 vs. MED (-33.995). MCW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 273M vs. MED (14.2M). MED has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. MCW (26.4M). MED has less debt than MCW: MED (13.1M) vs MCW (1.79B). MCW has higher revenues than MED: MCW (1.03B) vs MED (480M).
MCWMEDMCW / MED
Capitalization1.71B126M1,356%
EBITDA273M14.2M1,923%
Gain YTD-27.846-33.99582%
P/E Ratio19.31573.003%
Revenue1.03B480M214%
Total Cash26.4M163M16%
Total Debt1.79B13.1M13,656%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MED: Fundamental Ratings
MED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCWMED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHSX13.980.16
+1.16%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci A
HDSVX18.100.14
+0.78%
Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Retail
RMBTX12.100.05
+0.41%
RMB International I
FPACX45.900.11
+0.24%
FPA Crescent
PGEJX29.030.06
+0.21%
George Putnam Balanced R6

MCW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCW has been loosely correlated with DRVN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCW jumps, then DRVN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCW
1D Price
Change %
MCW100%
+3.14%
DRVN - MCW
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
PAG - MCW
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
AN - MCW
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
ABG - MCW
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.11%
RUSHB - MCW
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
More

MED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MED has been loosely correlated with EXPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MED jumps, then EXPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MED
1D Price
Change %
MED100%
-0.17%
EXPE - MED
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.14%
CSV - MED
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
SCI - MED
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
TNL - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
MCW - MED
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.14%
More