MCVT
Price
$1.90
Change
+$0.04 (+2.15%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
16.92M
RM
Price
$27.44
Change
+$0.46 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
236.25M
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCVT vs RM

Header iconMCVT vs RM Comparison
Open Charts MCVT vs RMBanner chart's image
Mill City Ventures III
Price$1.90
Change+$0.04 (+2.15%)
Volume$54.95K
Capitalization16.92M
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$27.44
Change+$0.46 (+1.70%)
Volume$25.92K
Capitalization236.25M
MCVT vs RM Comparison Chart
Loading...
MCVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCVT vs. RM commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVT is a StrongBuy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (MCVT: $1.84 vs. RM: $26.44)
Brand notoriety: MCVT and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCVT: 124% vs. RM: 80%
Market capitalization -- MCVT: $16.92M vs. RM: $236.25M
MCVT [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $16.92M. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCVT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCVT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the long-term than MCVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCVT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCVT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCVT is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

MCVT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -4.17% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

RM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RM($236M) has a higher market cap than MCVT($16.9M). MCVT has higher P/E ratio than RM: MCVT (20.83) vs RM (14.49). MCVT YTD gains are higher at: -5.747 vs. RM (-20.696). RM has more cash in the bank: 7.41M vs. MCVT (604K). MCVT has less debt than RM: MCVT (14.7K) vs RM (1.43B). RM has higher revenues than MCVT: RM (484M) vs MCVT (2.51M).
MCVTRMMCVT / RM
Capitalization16.9M236M7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.747-20.69628%
P/E Ratio20.8314.49144%
Revenue2.51M484M1%
Total Cash604K7.41M8%
Total Debt14.7K1.43B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCVT vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
MCVT
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2958
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9167
SMR RATING
1..100
8013
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (31) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (91) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCVT (80) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew significantly faster than MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

MCVT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MCVT’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MCVT (100) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MCVT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCVTRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

MCVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCVT and WRLD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCVT and WRLD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCVT
1D Price
Change %
MCVT100%
+0.55%
WRLD - MCVT
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
AER - MCVT
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
RM - MCVT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
PT - MCVT
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
AL - MCVT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More

RM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
-1.56%
ENVA - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
ATLC - RM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
SYF - RM
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
DFS - RM
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
COF - RM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More