Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$20.86
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. MCVSX (1.01B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.06) vs SSGSX (0.48). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. MCVSX (-21.46). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.06 vs. MCVSX (-8.13).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.334 | -1.034 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 5.31B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.48 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.46 | -8.48 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.54 | 1.10 | -2,053% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.13 | 18.06 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.32 | 18.76 | -146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement