Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$21.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.16B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. MCVSX (1.03B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.04) vs SSGSX (0.48). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (15 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.68 vs. MCVSX (-23.14). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.92 vs. MCVSX (-21.32).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.488 | 0.582 | 600% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 5.16B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.48 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.14 | -13.68 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.54 | -7.65 | 360% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.32 | 4.92 | -433% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.79 | 17.51 | -142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement