Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$22.10
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. MCVSX (1.03B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.04) vs SSGSX (0.48). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (15 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MCVSX (2.67) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MCVSX (44.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. SSGSX (-2.42). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.63 vs. MCVSX (-23.37).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.23 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.67 | 1.23 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.590 | -1.723 | -324% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 5.12B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.48 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.79 | -2.42 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.28 | 0.45 | -1,822% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.37 | -0.63 | 3,682% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.85 | 18.71 | -111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement