Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$21.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.22B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.22B vs. MCVSX (1.02B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.07) vs SSGSX (0.49). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (15 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. MCVSX (-23.31). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.71 vs. MCVSX (-16.39).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.481 | -0.129 | -1,146% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 5.22B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.49 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.31 | -12.62 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.05 | -6.25 | 432% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.39 | 8.71 | -188% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.68 | 20.45 | -121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement