Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCVSX vs SSGSX
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts MCVSX vs SSGSX
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value C
Price$20.54
Change-$0.18 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
MCVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. MCVSX (1.02B). MCVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: MCVSX (1.13) vs SSGSX (0.50). MCVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: MCVSX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). MCVSX (2.38) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). MCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). MCVSX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.53 vs. MCVSX (-18.36). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.88 vs. MCVSX (-8.83).
| MCVSX | SSGSX | MCVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.26 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.863 | -2.025 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 5.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.50 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.36 | -5.53 | 332% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.44 | -9.76 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.83 | 15.88 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.83 | 15.23 | -196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers