Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$12.85
Change+$0.67 (+5.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSMX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSMX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 71.2M vs. TRCLX (66.9M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCSMX (2.01) vs TRCLX (1.49). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (1.73) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. MCSMX (42.22). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. MCSMX (-37.09).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.73 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.325 | 10.035 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 66.9M | 106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.22 | 50.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.44 | 28.71 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.09 | -9.00 | 412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement