Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.93M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 71.6M vs. TRCLX (60.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.39) vs MCSMX (1.04). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.83 vs. TRCLX (41.88). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.20 vs. MCSMX (-37.40).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.304 | 27.083 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.6M | 60.9M | 118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.39 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.83 | 41.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.86 | 16.50 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.40 | -0.20 | 18,642% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement