Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.49M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSMX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSMX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX (65.5M) and TRCLX (62.5M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.36) vs MCSMX (1.07). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.77 vs. MCSMX (25.43). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.47 vs. MCSMX (-35.99).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.093 | 34.280 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.5M | 62.5M | 105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.43 | 33.77 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.29 | 28.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.99 | -6.47 | 556% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement