Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$11.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.23M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCSMX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSMX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 68.2M vs. TRCLX (63.5M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.34) vs MCSMX (1.04). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.01 vs. MCSMX (28.07). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.40 vs. MCSMX (-40.79).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.846 | 33.144 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.2M | 63.5M | 107% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.07 | 30.01 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.23 | 33.50 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.79 | -6.40 | 638% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.92 | N/A | - |