Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.28M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.31
Change-$0.06 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. TRCLX (53M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.61) vs MCSMX (1.22). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.05 vs. TRCLX (28.54). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.38 vs. MCSMX (-44.27).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.163 | 16.572 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.3M | 53M | 118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.05 | 28.54 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.90 | 4.17 | -213% |
| Returns for 5 years | -44.27 | -6.38 | 694% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement