Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCSMX vs TRCLX
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCSMX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$10.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.28M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.83
Change+$0.12 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.7M
MCSMX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSMX has more cash in the bank: 62.3M vs. TRCLX (46.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than MCSMX: TRCLX (1.61) vs MCSMX (1.22). MCSMX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCSMX (14 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCSMX (1.61). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCSMX (54.39). MCSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCSMX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.92 vs. TRCLX (14.38). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -3.76 vs. MCSMX (-46.48).
| MCSMX | TRCLX | MCSMX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.03 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 2.10 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.784 | 12.027 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.3M | 46.7M | 133% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.61 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.92 | 14.38 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.31 | -8.08 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | -46.48 | -3.76 | 1,236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.29 | N/A | - |