MCSHF
Price
$2.52
Change
-$0.32 (-11.23%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.97B
OGOFF
Price
$0.49
Change
+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
78.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCSHF vs OGOFF

Header iconMCSHF vs OGOFF Comparison
Open Charts MCSHF vs OGOFFBanner chart's image
Metcash
Price$2.52
Change-$0.32 (-11.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.97B
Organto Foods
Price$0.49
Change+$0.02 (+4.26%)
Volume$366.61K
Capitalization78.23M
MCSHF vs OGOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OGOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCSHF vs. OGOFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSHF is a Hold and OGOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MCSHF: $2.53 vs. OGOFF: $0.49)
Brand notoriety: MCSHF and OGOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCSHF: 32% vs. OGOFF: 362%
Market capitalization -- MCSHF: $2.97B vs. OGOFF: $78.23M
MCSHF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $2.97B. OGOFF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $78.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $39.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCSHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOGOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OGOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCSHF is a better buy in the long-term than OGOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCSHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OGOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OGOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCSHF and OGOFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCSHF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OGOFF (@Food Distributors) price change was -2.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-2.40% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCSHF($2.97B) has a higher market cap than OGOFF($78.2M). OGOFF YTD gains are higher at: 578.429 vs. MCSHF (13.995). MCSHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 640M vs. OGOFF (-1.73M). MCSHF has higher revenues than OGOFF: MCSHF (16.5B) vs OGOFF (29.7M).
MCSHFOGOFFMCSHF / OGOFF
Capitalization2.97B78.2M3,798%
EBITDA640M-1.73M-36,944%
Gain YTD13.995578.4292%
P/E Ratio14.96N/A-
Revenue16.5B29.7M55,556%
Total CashN/A863K-
Total DebtN/A12.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCSHF vs OGOFF: Fundamental Ratings
MCSHF
OGOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3981
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
79100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCSHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OGOFF (95). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew significantly faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OGOFF (100). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

MCSHF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as OGOFF (100). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew similarly to OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

OGOFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MCSHF (46). This means that OGOFF’s stock grew similarly to MCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCSHF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OGOFF (100). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OGOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCSHFOGOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OGOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBFGF0.850.02
+2.74%
HAPPY BELLY FOOD GROUP INC.
PBMLF0.710.02
+2.16%
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.
MITSY501.3710.21
+2.08%
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
IMIAF29.50N/A
N/A
IMI plc
HELFY2.27-0.02
-0.98%
Hellofresh SE

MCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCSHF and OGOFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCSHF and OGOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCSHF
1D Price
Change %
MCSHF100%
N/A
OGOFF - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
JRONY - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
MTTWF - MCSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVO - MCSHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
More

OGOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OGOFF and MCLE have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OGOFF and MCLE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OGOFF
1D Price
Change %
OGOFF100%
+4.06%
MCLE - OGOFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCSHF - OGOFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACITF - OGOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSHXF - OGOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - OGOFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More