MCSHF
Price
$2.18
Change
+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
MTTWF
Price
$6.10
Change
+$0.65 (+11.93%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCSHF vs MTTWF

Header iconMCSHF vs MTTWF Comparison
Open Charts MCSHF vs MTTWFBanner chart's image
Metcash
Price$2.18
Change+$0.08 (+3.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.34B
METRO AG
Price$6.10
Change+$0.65 (+11.93%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization3.16B
MCSHF vs MTTWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTTWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCSHF vs. MTTWF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCSHF is a Hold and MTTWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MCSHF: $2.18 vs. MTTWF: $6.10)
Brand notoriety: MCSHF and MTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCSHF: 1% vs. MTTWF: 54%
Market capitalization -- MCSHF: $2.34B vs. MTTWF: $3.16B
MCSHF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $2.34B. MTTWF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $3.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCSHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTTWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCSHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTTWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MCSHF and MTTWF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCSHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTTWF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCSHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MTTWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCSHF and MTTWF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCSHF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MTTWF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (+3.10% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTTWF($3.16B) has a higher market cap than MCSHF($2.34B). MTTWF has higher P/E ratio than MCSHF: MTTWF (15.15) vs MCSHF (13.61). MTTWF YTD gains are higher at: 14.662 vs. MCSHF (-1.580). MTTWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. MCSHF (558M). MTTWF has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. MCSHF (107M). MCSHF has less debt than MTTWF: MCSHF (1.32B) vs MTTWF (4.13B). MTTWF has higher revenues than MCSHF: MTTWF (30.9B) vs MCSHF (15.8B).
MCSHFMTTWFMCSHF / MTTWF
Capitalization2.34B3.16B74%
EBITDA558M1.43B39%
Gain YTD-1.58014.662-11%
P/E Ratio13.6115.1590%
Revenue15.8B30.9B51%
Total Cash107M1.03B10%
Total Debt1.32B4.13B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCSHF vs MTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
MCSHF
MTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTTWF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MCSHF (7). This means that MTTWF’s stock grew similarly to MCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MTTWF (100). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

MCSHF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MTTWF (93). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

MTTWF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MCSHF (50). This means that MTTWF’s stock grew similarly to MCSHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCSHF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MTTWF (99). This means that MCSHF’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCSHFMTTWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTTWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY614.913.04
+0.50%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107327.700000239.273440
+0.22%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL201.00N/A
N/A
Apple
TSLA323.63-2.15
-0.66%
Tesla
GME23.59-0.29
-1.21%
GameStop Corp

MCSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCSHF and OGOFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCSHF and OGOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCSHF
1D Price
Change %
MCSHF100%
N/A
OGOFF - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - MCSHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
MTTWF - MCSHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - MCSHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVO - MCSHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTWF and DIT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTWF and DIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTWF
1D Price
Change %
MTTWF100%
N/A
DIT - MTTWF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
CHEF - MTTWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
SYY - MTTWF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
CVGW - MTTWF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
UNFI - MTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
More