MCRPF
Price
$1.59
Change
-$0.21 (-11.67%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
NNCSF
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.45 (-14.75%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
807.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCRPF vs NNCSF

Header iconMCRPF vs NNCSF Comparison
Open Charts MCRPF vs NNCSFBanner chart's image
Microport Scientific
Price$1.59
Change-$0.21 (-11.67%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization3.24B
Nanosonics
Price$2.60
Change-$0.45 (-14.75%)
Volume$800
Capitalization807.43M
MCRPF vs NNCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCRPF vs. NNCSF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCRPF is a Hold and NNCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MCRPF: $1.59 vs. NNCSF: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: MCRPF and NNCSF are both not notable
MCRPF represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while NNCSF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCRPF: 107% vs. NNCSF: 44%
Market capitalization -- MCRPF: $3.24B vs. NNCSF: $807.43M
MCRPF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $3.24B. NNCSF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $807.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.15B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $162.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCRPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNNCSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCRPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NNCSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCRPF is a better buy in the long-term than NNCSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCRPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNCSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCRPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NNCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCRPF is a better buy in the short-term than NNCSF.

Price Growth

MCRPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NNCSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -14.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.15% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.55% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCRPF($3.24B) has a higher market cap than NNCSF($807M). MCRPF YTD gains are higher at: 93.902 vs. NNCSF (23.810).
MCRPFNNCSFMCRPF / NNCSF
Capitalization3.24B807M401%
EBITDAN/A28.2M-
Gain YTD93.90223.810394%
P/E RatioN/A59.63-
RevenueN/A186M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCRPF vs NNCSF: Fundamental Ratings
MCRPF
NNCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9294
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9672
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3752
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCRPF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as NNCSF (98). This means that MCRPF’s stock grew similarly to NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

MCRPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NNCSF (100). This means that MCRPF’s stock grew similarly to NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

NNCSF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MCRPF (96). This means that NNCSF’s stock grew similarly to MCRPF’s over the last 12 months.

MCRPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NNCSF (52). This means that MCRPF’s stock grew similarly to NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

MCRPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NNCSF (74). This means that MCRPF’s stock grew significantly faster than NNCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCRPFNNCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCRPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBPYX43.020.61
+1.44%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth I
FNGZX18.030.21
+1.18%
Franklin Intl Growth Adv
FSTBX22.140.13
+0.59%
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
JDDVX12.920.07
+0.54%
Janus Henderson U.S. Dividend Income D
EQPGX25.50N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth I

MCRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCRPF and LDDD have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCRPF and LDDD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCRPF
1D Price
Change %
MCRPF100%
N/A
LDDD - MCRPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHNKF - MCRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNCSF - MCRPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCHF - MCRPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDRSF - MCRPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NNCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NNCSF and MBGNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNCSF and MBGNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NNCSF
1D Price
Change %
NNCSF100%
N/A
MBGNF - NNCSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHNKY - NNCSF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
NVYTF - NNCSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POCI - NNCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
MCRPF - NNCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More