Advertisement
MCRNF vs NNOCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCRNF is a Hold and NNOCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCRNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNNOCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MCRNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NNOCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
MCRNF (@Semiconductors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NNOCF (@Semiconductors) price change was -5.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.22%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (+0.68% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| MCRNF | NNOCF | MCRNF / NNOCF | |
| Capitalization | 198M | 75.9M | 261% |
| EBITDA | 24.3M | -3.94M | -617% |
| Gain YTD | 0.855 | 1.847 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.05 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 73.8M | 2.93M | 2,519% |
| Total Cash | 10.7M | 5.98M | 179% |
| Total Debt | 2.51M | 2.05M | 123% |
MCRNF | NNOCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCRNF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOCF (34). This means that MCRNF’s stock grew similarly to NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
MCRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOCF (97). This means that MCRNF’s stock grew similarly to NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
MCRNF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNOCF (100). This means that MCRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
NNOCF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MCRNF (60). This means that NNOCF’s stock grew similarly to MCRNF’s over the last 12 months.
MCRNF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NNOCF (97). This means that MCRNF’s stock grew similarly to NNOCF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PGEYX | 26.18 | -0.19 | -0.72% |
| George Putnam Balanced Y | |||
| SSSFX | 22.88 | -0.37 | -1.59% |
| SouthernSun Small Cap, N | |||
| GTTUX | 51.34 | -0.92 | -1.76% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R6 | |||
| PZISX | 12.35 | -0.36 | -2.83% |
| Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional | |||
| LCMMX | 74.97 | -2.67 | -3.44% |
| ClearBridge Large Cap Growth O | |||
MCRNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCRNF and DINRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCRNF and DINRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCRNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCRNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| DINRF - MCRNF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TSM - MCRNF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.01% | ||
| RNECY - MCRNF | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.08% | ||
| MMTIF - MCRNF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RNECF - MCRNF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.01% | ||
More | ||||
NNOCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNOCF and ON have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNOCF and ON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNOCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNOCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ON - NNOCF | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
| LSRCY - NNOCF | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.11% | ||
| LSRCF - NNOCF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QNCCF - NNOCF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.80% | ||
| MCRNF - NNOCF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||