MCQEF
Price
$141.12
Change
+$0.66 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
45.69B
NHMAF
Price
$5.25
Change
+$1.32 (+33.59%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCQEF vs NHMAF

Header iconMCQEF vs NHMAF Comparison
Open Charts MCQEF vs NHMAFBanner chart's image
Macquarie Group
Price$141.12
Change+$0.66 (+0.47%)
Volume$250
Capitalization45.69B
Nihon M and A Center
Price$5.25
Change+$1.32 (+33.59%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.87B
MCQEF vs NHMAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCQEF vs. NHMAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCQEF is a Hold and NHMAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MCQEF: $141.12 vs. NHMAF: $5.25)
Brand notoriety: MCQEF and NHMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCQEF: 45% vs. NHMAF: 98%
Market capitalization -- MCQEF: $45.69B vs. NHMAF: $1.87B
MCQEF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $45.69B. NHMAF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCQEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNHMAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCQEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NHMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCQEF is a better buy in the long-term than NHMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCQEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHMAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCQEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NHMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NHMAF is a better buy in the short-term than MCQEF.

Price Growth

MCQEF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while NHMAF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCQEF($45.7B) has a higher market cap than NHMAF($1.87B). NHMAF has higher P/E ratio than MCQEF: NHMAF (25.00) vs MCQEF (13.00). NHMAF YTD gains are higher at: 21.810 vs. MCQEF (4.908). MCQEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.8B vs. NHMAF (12.1B). MCQEF has more cash in the bank: 87.8B vs. NHMAF (44B). NHMAF has less debt than MCQEF: NHMAF (500M) vs MCQEF (245B). NHMAF has higher revenues than MCQEF: NHMAF (36B) vs MCQEF (6.56B).
MCQEFNHMAFMCQEF / NHMAF
Capitalization45.7B1.87B2,448%
EBITDA14.8B12.1B122%
Gain YTD4.90821.81023%
P/E Ratio13.0025.0052%
Revenue6.56B36B18%
Total Cash87.8B44B200%
Total Debt245B500M49,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCQEF vs NHMAF: Fundamental Ratings
MCQEF
NHMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
732
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCQEF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHMAF (98). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHMAF (100). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as NHMAF (32). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew similarly to NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MCQEF (49). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to MCQEF’s over the last 12 months.

MCQEF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as NHMAF (71). This means that MCQEF’s stock grew similarly to NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCQEFNHMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCQEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGORX10.930.10
+0.92%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth R
ASGTX5.370.04
+0.75%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth A
FMGKX16.050.08
+0.50%
Fidelity Magellan K
RUSTX17.770.08
+0.45%
Russell Inv US Strategic Equity M
MLVTX19.720.05
+0.25%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R6

MCQEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCQEF and MATH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCQEF and MATH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCQEF
1D Price
Change %
MCQEF100%
N/A
MATH - MCQEF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.20%
SRL - MCQEF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
NPPTF - MCQEF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%
MQBKY - MCQEF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
OSCUF - MCQEF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NHMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHMAF and OSCUF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHMAF and OSCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHMAF
1D Price
Change %
NHMAF100%
N/A
OSCUF - NHMAF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTCM - NHMAF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
MCQEF - NHMAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLNH - NHMAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.44%
MGHL - NHMAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More