MCOIF
Price
$6.26
Change
-$0.35 (-5.30%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.14B
MHSDF
Price
$2.93
Change
-$0.12 (-3.93%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.41B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCOIF vs MHSDF

Header iconMCOIF vs MHSDF Comparison
Open Charts MCOIF vs MHSDFBanner chart's image
MultiChoice Group
Price$6.26
Change-$0.35 (-5.30%)
Volume$250
Capitalization2.14B
Megacable Holdings SAB DE CV
Price$2.93
Change-$0.12 (-3.93%)
Volume$300
Capitalization6.41B
MCOIF vs MHSDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MHSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCOIF vs. MHSDF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCOIF is a Hold and MHSDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MCOIF: $6.26 vs. MHSDF: $2.93)
Brand notoriety: MCOIF and MHSDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Movies/Entertainment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCOIF: 186% vs. MHSDF: 5%
Market capitalization -- MCOIF: $2.14B vs. MHSDF: $6.41B
MCOIF [@Movies/Entertainment] is valued at $2.14B. MHSDF’s [@Movies/Entertainment] market capitalization is $6.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry ranges from $262.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry is $10.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCOIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMHSDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCOIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MHSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHSDF is a better buy in the long-term than MCOIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCOIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHSDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCOIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MHSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCOIF is a better buy in the short-term than MHSDF.

Price Growth

MCOIF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а -5.29% price change this week, while MHSDF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Movies/Entertainment (+1.21% weekly)

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MHSDF($6.42B) has a higher market cap than MCOIF($2.14B). MCOIF has higher P/E ratio than MHSDF: MCOIF (40.00) vs MHSDF (24.63). MHSDF YTD gains are higher at: 74.542 vs. MCOIF (4.417). MHSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.41B vs. MCOIF (2.38B). MCOIF has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. MHSDF (1.65B). MHSDF has less debt than MCOIF: MHSDF (4.28B) vs MCOIF (21.5B). MCOIF has higher revenues than MHSDF: MCOIF (59.1B) vs MHSDF (27.7B).
MCOIFMHSDFMCOIF / MHSDF
Capitalization2.14B6.42B33%
EBITDA2.38B7.41B32%
Gain YTD4.41774.5426%
P/E Ratio40.0024.63162%
Revenue59.1B27.7B213%
Total Cash7.54B1.65B458%
Total Debt21.5B4.28B503%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCOIF vs MHSDF: Fundamental Ratings
MCOIF
MHSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7895
SMR RATING
1..100
10080
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCOIF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MHSDF (21). This means that MCOIF’s stock grew similarly to MHSDF’s over the last 12 months.

MCOIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MHSDF (95). This means that MCOIF’s stock grew similarly to MHSDF’s over the last 12 months.

MHSDF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MCOIF (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to MCOIF’s over the last 12 months.

MHSDF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MCOIF (53). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to MCOIF’s over the last 12 months.

MHSDF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCOIF (62). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCOIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCOIFMHSDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCOIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MHSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZBIX23.850.14
+0.59%
Virtus Small-Cap Institutional
CHRSX21.670.09
+0.42%
Invesco Charter S
VTWAX46.720.10
+0.21%
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Admiral
AGGWX18.44-0.04
-0.22%
American Century Global Gold R
MCHFX16.15-0.09
-0.55%
Matthews China Investor

MCOIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCOIF and CEVMF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCOIF and CEVMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCOIF
1D Price
Change %
MCOIF100%
N/A
CEVMF - MCOIF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJREF - MCOIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
MSGS - MCOIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
OAMCF - MCOIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
MHSDF - MCOIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MHSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHSDF and CJREF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHSDF and CJREF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHSDF
1D Price
Change %
MHSDF100%
N/A
CJREF - MHSDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
MCOIF - MHSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMGP - MHSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
QYOUF - MHSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.17%
THBRF - MHSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More