Advertisement
MCO vs NULC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCO is a Buy and NULC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -1.58% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (+2.17% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
MCO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MCO | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 63% | 18 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 4 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PYZ | 99.38 | 0.45 | +0.46% |
| Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF | |||
| BSMP | 24.52 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2025 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| HYKE | 25.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Vest 2 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF | |||
| VXUS | 70.22 | -0.22 | -0.31% |
| Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | |||
| FWD | 92.29 | -0.30 | -0.32% |
| AB Disruptors ETF | |||
MCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCO | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| SPGI - MCO | 85% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| NDAQ - MCO | 78% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| MORN - MCO | 75% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| TRU - MCO | 73% Closely correlated | -4.69% | ||
| MSCI - MCO | 68% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||
NULC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NULC has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NULC jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NULC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NULC | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| MCO - NULC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| PH - NULC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| AXP - NULC | 76% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CMI - NULC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| CAT - NULC | 70% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||