MCO
Price
$499.64
Change
+$3.20 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
89.64B
53 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$94.29
Change
+$0.52 (+0.55%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.11B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCO vs NDAQ

Header iconMCO vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts MCO vs NDAQBanner chart's image
Moody's
Price$499.64
Change+$3.20 (+0.64%)
Volume$4.62K
Capitalization89.64B
Nasdaq
Price$94.29
Change+$0.52 (+0.55%)
Volume$67.77K
Capitalization54.11B
MCO vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCO vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCO is a Buy and NDAQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MCO: $496.44 vs. NDAQ: $93.77)
Brand notoriety: MCO and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCO: 78% vs. NDAQ: 61%
Market capitalization -- MCO: $89.64B vs. NDAQ: $54.11B
MCO [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $89.64B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $54.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.59% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($89.6B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($54.1B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: MCO (42.50) vs NDAQ (36.27). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 22.075 vs. MCO (5.464). MCO has less debt than NDAQ: MCO (7.28B) vs NDAQ (9.63B).
MCONDAQMCO / NDAQ
Capitalization89.6B54.1B166%
EBITDAN/A2.83B-
Gain YTD5.46422.07525%
P/E Ratio42.5036.27117%
RevenueN/A8.11B-
Total CashN/A2.01B-
Total Debt7.28B9.63B76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCO vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
MCO
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7154
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3315
SMR RATING
1..100
1859
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6466
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (86) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (59) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MCO (55) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCONDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAXI27.890.64
+2.34%
Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Inc ETF
ECON24.840.10
+0.39%
Columbia Res Enh Emerging Econ ETF
FGD28.83N/A
N/A
First Trust Dow Jones Global Sel Div ETF
IJR117.01-0.14
-0.12%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
BTCZ2.99-0.08
-2.45%
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
-0.41%
SPGI - MCO
85%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
NDAQ - MCO
77%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
MORN - MCO
75%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
TRU - MCO
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
MSCI - MCO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.19%
MCO - NDAQ
77%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
MS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
JEF - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
GS - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
RJF - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More