MCO
Price
$471.04
Change
+$2.48 (+0.53%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
84.49B
3 days until earnings call
NCPL
Price
$2.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCO vs NCPL

Header iconMCO vs NCPL Comparison
Open Charts MCO vs NCPLBanner chart's image
Moody's
Price$471.04
Change+$2.48 (+0.53%)
Volume$1.38M
Capitalization84.49B
NETCAPITAL
Price$2.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27.06K
Capitalization11.02M
MCO vs NCPL Comparison Chart in %
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCO vs. NCPL commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCO is a Hold and NCPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MCO: $471.04 vs. NCPL: $2.24)
Brand notoriety: MCO and NCPL are both not notable
MCO represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while NCPL is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCO: 181% vs. NCPL: 16%
Market capitalization -- MCO: $84.49B vs. NCPL: $11.02M
MCO [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $84.49B. NCPL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $144.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNCPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NCPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the short-term than NCPL.

Price Growth

MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.70% price change this week, while NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.05% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.26% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($84.5B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($11M). NCPL YTD gains are higher at: 7.692 vs. MCO (0.068). MCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.59B vs. NCPL (-29.31M). MCO has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. NCPL (4.56M). NCPL has less debt than MCO: NCPL (3.02M) vs MCO (7.28B). MCO has higher revenues than NCPL: MCO (7.31B) vs NCPL (917K).
MCONCPLMCO / NCPL
Capitalization84.5B11M768,182%
EBITDA3.59B-29.31M-12,233%
Gain YTD0.0687.6921%
P/E Ratio40.05N/A-
Revenue7.31B917K796,838%
Total Cash2.29B4.56M50,197%
Total Debt7.28B3.02M241,126%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCO vs NCPL: Fundamental Ratings
MCO
NCPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
143
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
1899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCPL's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (82) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (99) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as MCO (60) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCONCPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIP5.680.27
+4.99%
FTAI Infrastructure
BSLK2.910.12
+4.30%
Bolt Projects Holdings Inc
AZZ97.75-1.50
-1.51%
AZZ
TECK43.35-0.95
-2.14%
Teck Resources Limited
FTCI8.74-0.68
-7.22%
FTC Solar

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
+0.53%
SPGI - MCO
89%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
NDAQ - MCO
78%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
MORN - MCO
75%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
MSCI - MCO
69%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
TRU - MCO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and LAZ have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and LAZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
N/A
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
MCO - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
MS - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
NMR - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JEF - NCPL
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.94%
More