It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSCI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSCI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MCO (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.64% price change this week, while MSCI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.28%.
MCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
MSCI is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
MCO | MSCI | MCO / MSCI | |
Capitalization | 71.9B | 44.4B | 162% |
EBITDA | 2.49B | 1.72B | 145% |
Gain YTD | 20.358 | 8.164 | 249% |
P/E Ratio | 45.12 | 38.56 | 117% |
Revenue | 5.73B | 2.53B | 226% |
Total Cash | N/A | 458M | - |
Total Debt | 7.27B | 4.63B | 157% |
MCO | MSCI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 29 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSCI's Valuation (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (93). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MSCI (24). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.
MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCO (83). This means that MSCI’s stock grew significantly faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MSCI's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (50). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MSCI (73). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.
MCO | MSCI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | 3 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago49% | 3 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago65% | 3 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 5 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MCO | 100% | +0.92% | ||
SPGI - MCO | 75% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
MORN - MCO | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
NDAQ - MCO | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
ICE - MCO | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
FDS - MCO | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MSCI | 100% | +0.70% | ||
SPGI - MSCI | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
FDS - MSCI | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
MORN - MSCI | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
MCO - MSCI | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
NDAQ - MSCI | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More |