Advertisement
MCHVY vs SCHYY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHVY is a Hold and SCHYY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MCHVY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MCHVY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SCHYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MCHVY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYY’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MCHVY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SCHYY’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
MCHVY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCHYY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.47%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.73% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| MCHVY | SCHYY | MCHVY / SCHYY | |
| Capitalization | 7.62B | 21.7B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 7.78B | 2.05B | 380% |
| Gain YTD | 71.613 | 6.334 | 1,131% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.52 | 23.88 | 57% |
| Revenue | 31.8B | 7.02B | 453% |
| Total Cash | 5.52B | 303M | 1,821% |
| Total Debt | 21.8B | 7.09B | 308% |
MCHVY | SCHYY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MCHVY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (38). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHYY (100). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (15). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (48). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
MCHVY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (32). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
| MCHVY | SCHYY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KBA | 31.01 | 0.15 | +0.49% |
| KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF | |||
| LTTI | 19.30 | 0.08 | +0.42% |
| FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | |||
| COLO | 38.37 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | |||
| BAB | 27.23 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
| Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| SFYF | 56.99 | -0.21 | -0.36% |
| SoFi Social 50 ETF | |||
MCHVY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHVY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHVY | 100% | N/A | ||
| AAPI - MCHVY | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.69% | ||
| MLCO - MCHVY | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| WYNN - MCHVY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SCHYY - MCHVY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
| GXYEF - MCHVY | 18% Poorly correlated | +5.84% | ||
More | ||||
SCHYY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHYY has been closely correlated with GXYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHYY jumps, then GXYYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYY | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYY | 81% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYY | 75% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| WYNN - SCHYY | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MLCO - SCHYY | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| LVS - SCHYY | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||