MCHVY
Price
$21.45
Change
+$0.11 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.73B
PYTCY
Price
$10.00
Change
+$1.42 (+16.55%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHVY vs PYTCY

Header iconMCHVY vs PYTCY Comparison
Open Charts MCHVY vs PYTCYBanner chart's image
MGM China Holdings
Price$21.45
Change+$0.11 (+0.52%)
Volume$155
Capitalization7.73B
Playtech
Price$10.00
Change+$1.42 (+16.55%)
Volume$202
Capitalization1.64B
MCHVY vs PYTCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYTCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHVY vs. PYTCY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHVY is a Hold and PYTCY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHVY: $20.49 vs. PYTCY: $10.00)
Brand notoriety: MCHVY and PYTCY are both not notable
MCHVY represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while PYTCY is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHVY: 20% vs. PYTCY: 111%
Market capitalization -- MCHVY: $7.73B vs. PYTCY: $1.64B
MCHVY [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $7.73B. PYTCY’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $1.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.86B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $51.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHVY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePYTCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PYTCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the long-term than PYTCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHVY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PYTCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHVY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PYTCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYTCY is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVY.

Price Growth

MCHVY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PYTCY (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.71% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Casinos/Gaming (+2.33% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVY($7.73B) has a higher market cap than PYTCY($1.64B). PYTCY has higher P/E ratio than MCHVY: PYTCY (22.81) vs MCHVY (12.35). MCHVY YTD gains are higher at: 49.314 vs. PYTCY (-7.532).
MCHVYPYTCYMCHVY / PYTCY
Capitalization7.73B1.64B472%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD49.314-7.532-655%
P/E Ratio12.3522.8154%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVY vs PYTCY: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVY
PYTCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6176
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4381
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHVY's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as PYTCY (62). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to PYTCY’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PYTCY (76). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to PYTCY’s over the last 12 months.

PYTCY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHVY (100). This means that PYTCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHVY’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYTCY (81). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYTCY’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as PYTCY (48). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to PYTCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHVYPYTCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PYTCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAT53.850.38
+0.71%
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
CGIB25.300.05
+0.20%
Capital Group Intl Bd ETF USD-Hdg
FELC36.24-0.12
-0.33%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
MCN6.27-0.03
-0.40%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund
NOM10.91-0.14
-1.27%
Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund

MCHVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVY
1D Price
Change %
MCHVY100%
N/A
AAPI - MCHVY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNN - MCHVY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
GXYEF - MCHVY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVY
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
MCHVF - MCHVY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PYTCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PYTCY and SCHYY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYTCY and SCHYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYTCY
1D Price
Change %
PYTCY100%
N/A
SCHYY - PYTCY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
NGCRF - PYTCY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYF - PYTCY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLUT - PYTCY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
MCHVY - PYTCY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More