MCHVF
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.07 (-4.43%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
SCHYF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.34 (+19.32%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
30.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHVF vs SCHYF

Header iconMCHVF vs SCHYF Comparison
Open Charts MCHVF vs SCHYFBanner chart's image
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.51
Change-$0.07 (-4.43%)
Volume$800
Capitalization5.04B
Sands China
Price$2.10
Change+$0.34 (+19.32%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization30.88B
MCHVF vs SCHYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHVF vs. SCHYF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHVF is a Hold and SCHYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHVF: $1.51 vs. SCHYF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: MCHVF and SCHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHVF: 104% vs. SCHYF: 9%
Market capitalization -- MCHVF: $5.04B vs. SCHYF: $30.88B
MCHVF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $5.04B. SCHYF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $30.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVF.

Price Growth

MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -4.43% price change this week, while SCHYF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($30.9B) has a higher market cap than MCHVF($5.04B). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 43.810 vs. SCHYF (-14.408). SCHYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -339M vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). MCHVF has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. SCHYF (766M). SCHYF has less debt than MCHVF: SCHYF (8.66B) vs MCHVF (30.6B). MCHVF has higher revenues than SCHYF: MCHVF (7.92B) vs SCHYF (2.17B).
MCHVFSCHYFMCHVF / SCHYF
Capitalization5.04B30.9B16%
EBITDA-1.06B-339M312%
Gain YTD43.810-14.408-304%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.92B2.17B365%
Total Cash6.95B766M907%
Total Debt30.6B8.66B353%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVF vs SCHYF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVF
SCHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHYF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (87). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (100). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (54). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (93). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHVFSCHYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LLYVK81.611.36
+1.69%
Liberty Media Corp
HPP2.720.03
+1.12%
Hudson Pacific Properties
MYNZ1.43N/A
N/A
Mainz Biomed N.V.
BIDU86.35-0.09
-0.10%
Baidu
CTGO19.65-0.45
-2.24%
Contango ORE

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MCHVY - MCHVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
N/A
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
SJMHF - SCHYF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - SCHYF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - SCHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
More