MCHVF
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.07 (-4.43%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
MCHVY
Price
$21.34
Change
+$0.34 (+1.62%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHVF vs MCHVY

Header iconMCHVF vs MCHVY Comparison
Open Charts MCHVF vs MCHVYBanner chart's image
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.51
Change-$0.07 (-4.43%)
Volume$800
Capitalization5.04B
MGM China Holdings
Price$21.34
Change+$0.34 (+1.62%)
Volume$9.44K
Capitalization5.04B
MCHVF vs MCHVY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHVF vs. MCHVY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHVF is a Hold and MCHVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHVF: $1.51 vs. MCHVY: $21.34)
Brand notoriety: MCHVF and MCHVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHVF: 104% vs. MCHVY: 1053%
Market capitalization -- MCHVF: $5.04B vs. MCHVY: $5.04B
MCHVF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $5.04B. MCHVY’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCHVY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVF.

Price Growth

MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -4.43% price change this week, while MCHVY (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +9.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.58% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVF($5.04B) and MCHVY($5.04B) have the same market capitalization . MCHVY YTD gains are higher at: 48.549 vs. MCHVF (43.810). MCHVF (-1.06B) and MCHVY (-1.06B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . MCHVF (6.95B) and MCHVY (6.95B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . MCHVF (30.6B) and MCHVY (30.6B) have identical debt. MCHVF (7.92B) and MCHVY (7.92B) have equivalent revenues.
MCHVFMCHVYMCHVF / MCHVY
Capitalization5.04B5.04B100%
EBITDA-1.06B-1.06B100%
Gain YTD43.81048.54990%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.92B7.92B100%
Total Cash6.95B6.95B100%
Total Debt30.6B30.6B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVF vs MCHVY: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVF
MCHVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8354
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9392
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHVY's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (87). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (83). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (100). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (54). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVY's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHVF (93). This means that MCHVY’s stock grew similarly to MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHVFMCHVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QOWZ35.730.38
+1.06%
Invesco Nasdaq Free CA Flw Achiev ETF
OCTU26.520.18
+0.70%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncOctETF
AVDS62.590.16
+0.25%
Avantis International Small Cp Eq ETF
UTWO48.33N/A
N/A
F/m US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
COPX46.46-0.16
-0.34%
Global X Copper Miners ETF

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MCHVY - MCHVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVY
1D Price
Change %
MCHVY100%
N/A
AAPI - MCHVY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNN - MCHVY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
GXYEF - MCHVY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MCHVF - MCHVY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More