MCHT
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.30 (-4.11%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.38M
SBFG
Price
$20.28
Change
-$0.28 (-1.36%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
128.39M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHT vs SBFG

Header iconMCHT vs SBFG Comparison
Open Charts MCHT vs SBFGBanner chart's image
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial
Price$7.00
Change-$0.30 (-4.11%)
Volume$250
Capitalization23.38M
SB Financial Group
Price$20.28
Change-$0.28 (-1.36%)
Volume$10.21K
Capitalization128.39M
MCHT vs SBFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHT vs. SBFG commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHT is a Hold and SBFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHT: $7.00 vs. SBFG: $20.28)
Brand notoriety: MCHT and SBFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHT: 75% vs. SBFG: 48%
Market capitalization -- MCHT: $23.38M vs. SBFG: $128.39M
MCHT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.38M. SBFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $128.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFG is a better buy in the long-term than MCHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MCHT and SBFG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MCHT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.11% price change this week, while SBFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBFG($128M) has a higher market cap than MCHT($23.4M). MCHT has higher P/E ratio than SBFG: MCHT (11.67) vs SBFG (11.08). MCHT YTD gains are higher at: 13.372 vs. SBFG (-0.982).
MCHTSBFGMCHT / SBFG
Capitalization23.4M128M18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.372-0.982-1,362%
P/E Ratio11.6711.08105%
RevenueN/A62.3M-
Total CashN/A79.5M-
Total DebtN/A54.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHT vs SBFG: Fundamental Ratings
MCHT
SBFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10039
SMR RATING
1..100
10056
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1447
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFG's Valuation (32) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MCHT (34) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (100) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's SMR Rating (56) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (100) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MCHT (54) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBFG (47) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MCHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHTSBFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIRYY13.450.90
+7.17%
Air China, Ltd.
CMUV24.720.32
+1.32%
CMUV Bancorp
NOSUF0.01N/A
N/A
Nerds On Site Inc.
HAPVD10.01N/A
N/A
HAPVIDA PARTICIPACOES E INVESTIMENTOS SA
AERG2.00-0.02
-0.99%
Applied Energetics, Inc.

MCHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHT and BRBS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHT and BRBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHT
1D Price
Change %
MCHT100%
N/A
BRBS - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
SBFG - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
EMYB - MCHT
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
MBIN - MCHT
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
LYBC - MCHT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBFG has been loosely correlated with CZWI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBFG jumps, then CZWI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFG
1D Price
Change %
SBFG100%
-1.36%
CZWI - SBFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
EBC - SBFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
FUNC - SBFG
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
WNEB - SBFG
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
VLY - SBFG
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More