MCHT
Price
$6.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SBFG
Price
$19.27
Change
+$0.27 (+1.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
95.02M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHT vs SBFG

Header iconMCHT vs SBFG Comparison
Open Charts MCHT vs SBFGBanner chart's image
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial
Price$6.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$102
CapitalizationN/A
SB Financial Group
Price$19.27
Change+$0.27 (+1.42%)
Volume$16.65K
Capitalization95.02M
MCHT vs SBFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHT vs. SBFG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHT is a Hold and SBFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHT: $6.26 vs. SBFG: $19.27)
Brand notoriety: MCHT and SBFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHT: 32% vs. SBFG: 38%
Market capitalization -- MCHT: $0 vs. SBFG: $95.02M
MCHT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. SBFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $95.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFG is a better buy in the long-term than MCHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBFG is a better buy in the short-term than MCHT.

Price Growth

MCHT (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SBFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHT YTD gains are higher at: 1.387 vs. SBFG (-6.575).
MCHTSBFGMCHT / SBFG
CapitalizationN/A95M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.387-6.575-21%
P/E RatioN/A8.00-
RevenueN/A57M-
Total CashN/A19M-
Total DebtN/A103M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHT vs SBFG: Fundamental Ratings
MCHT
SBFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
10050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHT's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SBFG (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to SBFG’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (100) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's SMR Rating (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHT (100) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MCHT (76) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MCHT (21) in the null industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHTSBFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIFFF1.850.10
+5.82%
Li-Ft Power Ltd.
BZLFY15.910.04
+0.25%
Bunzl plc
TGCB0.04N/A
N/A
Tego Cyber Inc.
BYLB90.00-0.01
-0.01%
Boyle Bancorp, Inc.
NPPNY5.42-0.06
-1.09%
Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd.

MCHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHT and BRBS have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHT and BRBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHT
1D Price
Change %
MCHT100%
N/A
BRBS - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
SBFG - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
EMYB - MCHT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESSA - MCHT
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
MBIN - MCHT
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More

SBFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBFG has been loosely correlated with EBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBFG jumps, then EBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFG
1D Price
Change %
SBFG100%
+1.42%
EBC - SBFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
UBFO - SBFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
NIC - SBFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
FUNC - SBFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
WNEB - SBFG
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.21%
More