MCHT
Price
$6.95
Change
-$0.05 (-0.71%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
23.22M
RF
Price
$23.58
Change
+$0.23 (+0.99%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
21.04B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHT vs RF

Header iconMCHT vs RF Comparison
Open Charts MCHT vs RFBanner chart's image
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial
Price$6.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
Volume$100
Capitalization23.22M
Regions Financial
Price$23.58
Change+$0.23 (+0.99%)
Volume$47.52M
Capitalization21.04B
MCHT vs RF Comparison Chart in %
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHT vs. RF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHT is a Buy and RF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHT: $6.95 vs. RF: $23.58)
Brand notoriety: MCHT: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHT: 65% vs. RF: 217%
Market capitalization -- MCHT: $23.22M vs. RF: $21.04B
MCHT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.22M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHT is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHT is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

MCHT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($21B) has a higher market cap than MCHT($23.2M). MCHT has higher P/E ratio than RF: MCHT (11.58) vs RF (10.39). MCHT YTD gains are higher at: 12.562 vs. RF (3.520). RF has higher revenues than MCHT: RF (7.29B) vs MCHT (19.4M).
MCHTRFMCHT / RF
Capitalization23.2M21B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.5623.520357%
P/E Ratio11.5810.39112%
Revenue19.4M7.29B0%
Total CashN/A3.25B-
Total DebtN/A5.28B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHT vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHT
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
327
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHT's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (69) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHT (100) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MCHT (32) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MCHT’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (60) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCHT’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHT's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (76) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MCHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USA6.240.04
+0.65%
Liberty All-Star Equity Fund
SHYD22.800.03
+0.13%
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
CEW18.920.02
+0.08%
WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strat ETF
IBGL25.19N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Trsy ETF
VGI7.79-0.03
-0.38%
VIRTUS GLOBAL MULTI-SECTOR Income FUND

MCHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHT and CTYP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHT and CTYP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHT
1D Price
Change %
MCHT100%
N/A
CTYP - MCHT
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
RF - MCHT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
LSFG - MCHT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
FNBT - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
BKALF - MCHT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.99%
FITB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
FNB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
CFG - RF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
More