29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHS vs YMM
MCHS vs YMM Comparison
Open Charts MCHS vs YMM
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.22
Change+$1.88 (+6.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5M
Full Truck Alliance
Price$12.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.25%)
Volume$5.5K
Capitalization7.78B
MCHS vs YMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHS vs. YMM commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHS is a Buy and YMM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHS | YMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DINT | 26.35 | 0.22 | +0.86% |
| Davis Select International ETF | |||
| MAYP | 29.39 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May | |||
| FGB | 4.15 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Specialty Finance and Financial Opportunities Fund | |||
| IVOV | 97.47 | -0.35 | -0.35% |
| Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | |||
| JHAC | 14.71 | -0.14 | -0.94% |
| JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.43% |
YMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMM has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMM jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| BILI - YMM | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| TUYA - YMM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| NTES - YMM | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| SOHU - YMM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| KC - YMM | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||