Intraday BUY SELL Signals
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHS vs YMM
MCHS vs YMM Comparison
Open Charts MCHS vs YMM
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$33.12
Change-$0.15 (-0.45%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.67M
Full Truck Alliance
Price$11.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
Volume$4.74M
Capitalization11.84B
MCHS vs YMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHS vs. YMM commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHS is a Hold and YMM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHS | YMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCTE | 25.00 | 0.20 | +0.79% |
| SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF | |||
| RSEE | 33.91 | 0.15 | +0.44% |
| Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | |||
| IQSU | 54.33 | 0.06 | +0.11% |
| NYLI Candriam U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | |||
| JBBB | 47.71 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | |||
| BLOX | 19.04 | -0.17 | -0.86% |
| Nicholas Crypto Income ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.51% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.64% |
YMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMM has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMM jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| BILI - YMM | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| DIDIY - YMM | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TUYA - YMM | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NTES - YMM | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| DBD - YMM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||