Intraday BUY SELL Signals
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHS vs YMM
MCHS vs YMM Comparison
Open Charts MCHS vs YMM
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$34.18
Change+$0.30 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71M
Full Truck Alliance
Price$12.57
Change-$0.08 (-0.63%)
Volume$40.32K
Capitalization13.23B
MCHS vs YMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHS vs. YMM commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHS is a Buy and YMM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHS | YMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BKDV | 28.51 | 0.19 | +0.67% |
| BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF | |||
| MVPA | 32.52 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Miller Value Ptnrs Appreciation ETF | |||
| IRVH | 20.76 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Interest Rt Vol & Infl Hdg ETF | |||
| RAVI | 75.45 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | |||
| CLOU | 23.88 | -0.31 | -1.28% |
| Global X Cloud Computing ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.24% |
YMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMM has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMM jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| BILI - YMM | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| DIDIY - YMM | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| TUYA - YMM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| NTES - YMM | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| RIOT - YMM | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
More | ||||