10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHS vs YMM
MCHS vs YMM Comparison
Open Charts MCHS vs YMM
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$31.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52M
Full Truck Alliance
Price$11.26
Change-$0.06 (-0.53%)
Volume$86.71K
Capitalization11.84B
MCHS vs YMM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHS vs. YMM commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHS is a Hold and YMM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHS | YMM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACES | 27.07 | 0.24 | +0.89% |
| ALPS Clean Energy ETF | |||
| LFBB | 168.95 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2063 Longevity Income ETF | |||
| ETV | 13.97 | -0.03 | -0.21% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | |||
| NDIV | 27.47 | -0.17 | -0.62% |
| Amplify Natural Resources Div Inc ETF | |||
| PEJ | 56.42 | -0.41 | -0.72% |
| Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF | |||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.68% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.23% |
YMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YMM has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YMM jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | 100% | -2.67% | ||
| BILI - YMM | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| TUYA - YMM | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| NTES - YMM | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| KC - YMM | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.44% | ||
| SOHU - YMM | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||