Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHI vs PGJ
MCHI vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts MCHI vs PGJ
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$60.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.73K
Net Assets7.74B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$28.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.70%)
Volume$100
Net Assets131.44M
MCHI vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHI vs. PGJ commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHI is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 7.74B vs. PGJ (131M). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: MCHI (0.400) vs PGJ (-0.809). MCHI was incepted earlier than PGJ: MCHI (15 years) vs PGJ (21 years). MCHI (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than PGJ (0.70). PGJ has a higher turnover MCHI (12.00) vs MCHI (12.00).
| MCHI | PGJ | MCHI / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 0.400 | -0.809 | -49% |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 131M | 5,908% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.70 | 84% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 25.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 2.03 | 3.29 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHI | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -1.24% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | -6.56% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | -4.77% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | -7.69% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| VIPS - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| ATHM - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||