Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHI vs PGJ
MCHI vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts MCHI vs PGJ
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$54.72
Change-$0.28 (-0.51%)
Volume$2.23M
Net Assets6.36B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$28.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
Volume$26.26K
Net Assets139.23M
MCHI vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHI vs. PGJ commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHI is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 6.36B vs. PGJ (139M). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: MCHI (17.926) vs PGJ (10.437). MCHI was incepted earlier than PGJ: MCHI (14 years) vs PGJ (21 years). MCHI (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than PGJ (0.67). PGJ has a higher turnover MCHI (15.00) vs MCHI (15.00).
| MCHI | PGJ | MCHI / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 17.926 | 10.437 | 172% |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 139M | 4,578% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 38.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 2.59 | 1.77 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHI | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| BEKE - MCHI | 73% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BZ - MCHI | 69% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| HTHT - MCHI | 67% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| YUMC - MCHI | 67% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| IQ - MCHI | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| WB - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 82% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BEKE - PGJ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||