Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHI vs OBOR
MCHI vs OBOR Comparison
Open Charts MCHI vs OBOR
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$60.12
Change-$0.95 (-1.56%)
Volume$3.43K
Net Assets7.84B
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road ETF
Price$28.70
Change+$0.30 (+1.06%)
Volume$139
Net Assets4.26M
MCHI vs OBOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHI vs. OBOR commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHI is a Hold and OBOR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 7.84B vs. OBOR (4.26M). OBOR has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHI: OBOR (7.105) vs MCHI (1.665). MCHI was incepted earlier than OBOR: MCHI (15 years) vs OBOR (8 years). MCHI (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than OBOR (0.79). OBOR has a higher turnover MCHI (12.00) vs MCHI (12.00).
| MCHI | OBOR | MCHI / OBOR | |
| Gain YTD | 1.665 | 7.105 | 23% |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 4.26M | 183,994% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 19.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 2.03 | 1.80 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHI | OBOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | -3.67% | ||
More | ||||
OBOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBOR and ZIM have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBOR and ZIM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBOR | 100% | +2.46% | ||
| ZIM - OBOR | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.99% | ||
| ARBK - OBOR | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| ICL - OBOR | 2% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
| ACGP - OBOR | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.23% | ||
| ESLT - OBOR | -2% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
More | ||||