| MCHI | MCHS | MCHI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 34.047 | 30.621 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 8.07B | 2.67M | 302,211% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 115.31 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.29 | 4.27 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
| MCHI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 13 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BKAG | 42.48 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
| BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | |||
| SPVM | 66.61 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | |||
| EMDV | 46.93 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Div Growers | |||
| GENW | 12.97 | N/A | N/A |
| Genter Capital International Div ETF | |||
| BGR | 13.67 | -0.07 | -0.48% |
| Blackrock Energy and Resources Trust | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -0.73% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +2.51% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.64% |