Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHI vs MCHS
MCHI vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts MCHI vs MCHS
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$55.18
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.27M
Net Assets6.41B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$28.61
Change-$0.08 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.3M
MCHI vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHI vs. MCHS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHI is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 6.41B vs. MCHS (2.3M). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: MCHI (18.918) vs MCHS (12.640). MCHI was incepted earlier than MCHS: MCHI (14 years) vs MCHS (1 year). MCHI (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover MCHI (15.00) vs MCHI (15.00).
| MCHI | MCHS | MCHI / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 18.918 | 12.640 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 6.41B | 2.3M | 278,497% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 115.31 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.04 | 5.06 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MCHI | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| BEKE - MCHI | 73% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BZ - MCHI | 69% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| HTHT - MCHI | 67% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| YUMC - MCHI | 67% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| IQ - MCHI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A |