Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$14.62
Change-$0.28 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.43M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.52
Change-$0.14 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.48M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 392M vs. TRCLX (45.5M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCHFX (1.82) vs TRCLX (1.69). MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (27 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.71 vs. TRCLX (7.90). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.01 vs. MCHFX (-26.40).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.780 | 9.091 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 45.5M | 862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.71 | 7.90 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.10 | -0.80 | 1,018% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.40 | 0.01 | -453,561% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers