Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$17.55
Change+$0.17 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.34M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MCHFX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHFX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 436M vs. TRCLX (62.5M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCHFX (1.47) vs TRCLX (1.36). MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (28 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.99 vs. MCHFX (28.10). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.14 vs. MCHFX (-29.78).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.580 | 34.754 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 62.5M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.36 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.10 | 33.99 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 25.47 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.78 | -6.14 | 485% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.56 | N/A | - |