Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MCHFX vs TRCLX
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MCHFX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Investor
Price$16.15
Change-$0.09 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.19M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.05M
MCHFX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHFX has more cash in the bank: 378M vs. TRCLX (53M). MCHFX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MCHFX (1.72) vs TRCLX (1.61). MCHFX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MCHFX (27 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MCHFX (1.25). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MCHFX (49.99). MCHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MCHFX (2500) vs TRCLX (500000). MCHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.17 vs. TRCLX (30.51). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -2.33 vs. MCHFX (-28.25).
| MCHFX | TRCLX | MCHFX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.03 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.10 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.164 | 17.140 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 378M | 53M | 713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.61 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.17 | 30.51 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.33 | 4.02 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.25 | -2.33 | 1,214% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers