MCHB
Price
$13.91
Change
+$0.16 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
36 days until earnings call
MNMB
Price
$39.70
Change
+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
52.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MCHB vs MNMB

Header iconMCHB vs MNMB Comparison
Open Charts MCHB vs MNMBBanner chart's image
Mechanics Ban
Price$13.91
Change+$0.16 (+1.16%)
Volume$256.87K
Capitalization3.06B
Merchants & Marine Ban
Price$39.70
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Volume$255
Capitalization52.81M
MCHB vs MNMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MCHB vs. MNMB commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MCHB is a StrongBuy and MNMB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MCHB: $13.91 vs. MNMB: $39.70)
Brand notoriety: MCHB and MNMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MCHB: 196% vs. MNMB: 47%
Market capitalization -- MCHB: $3.06B vs. MNMB: $52.81M
MCHB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.06B. MNMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $52.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MCHB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MCHB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNMB is a better buy in the long-term than MCHB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MCHB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNMB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MCHB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHB is a better buy in the short-term than MNMB.

Price Growth

MCHB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while MNMB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

MCHB is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHB($3.06B) has a higher market cap than MNMB($52.8M). MCHB has higher P/E ratio than MNMB: MCHB (16.51) vs MNMB (8.98). MNMB YTD gains are higher at: -3.777 vs. MCHB (-99.948).
MCHBMNMBMCHB / MNMB
Capitalization3.06B52.8M5,792%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-99.948-3.7772,646%
P/E Ratio16.518.98184%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A54M-
Total DebtN/A530K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHB vs MNMB: Fundamental Ratings
MCHB
MNMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
1577
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNMB's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (68). This means that MNMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MNMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (100). This means that MNMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNMB (77). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNMB’s over the last 12 months.

MNMB's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHB (98). This means that MNMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHB’s over the last 12 months.

MCHB's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNMB (57). This means that MCHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MCHBMNMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MCHB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCXLF17.20N/A
N/A
Hiscox, Ltd.
PMREF11.14N/A
N/A
PRIMARIS REAL ESTATE INV TRUST TR.
CYVF72.00N/A
N/A
Crystal Valley Financial Corp.
DRJG0.03N/A
N/A
DRJ International Group Limited Inc.
DASTY32.81-0.09
-0.27%
Dassault Systemes SA

MCHB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHB has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHB jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHB
1D Price
Change %
MCHB100%
+1.16%
GPFOF - MCHB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OSBK - MCHB
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLX - MCHB
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
FBPA - MCHB
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - MCHB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNMB and FBPA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNMB and FBPA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNMB
1D Price
Change %
MNMB100%
N/A
FBPA - MNMB
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPFOF - MNMB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHB - MNMB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
MLYBY - MNMB
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNAT - MNMB
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More